Tuesday, February 9, 2010
Click for Denver, Colorado Forecast
Search

FOX 31 STORY

Nuggets

Frame De Art

DENVER DAILY TWITTER

Paramount

 

Pro-union measure gathers more support

Small businesses, faith leaders back free choice act

Peter Marcus, DDN Staff Writer

Tuesday, July 7, 2009

 


Colorado small business owners and faith leaders are supporting federal legislation that would allow workers to form a union through signing cards instead of holding a so-called secret ballot election.

The Employee Free Choice Act this week and last has gained the support of over 225 small businesses, as well as a coalition of more than 120 faith leaders from around the state.

“America’s faith traditions are nearly unanimous in support of the right of workers to organize free from employer retaliation,” said Rev. Dr. Dana Wilbanks, an ethics professor at Iliff School of Theology in Denver. “By using sacred text and tradition, our faith compels us to support the Employee Free Choice Act and to support the freedom of workers to collectively bargain for a shot at a better life for themselves and their families.”


What the bill would do

The federal legislation would allow workers to form a union by getting a majority of workers to sign cards to join instead of holding a so-called secret ballot election. Employers are currently allowed to decide whether workers must hold an election or organize via the so-called “card check” system.

Critics, however, say the measure would subject workers to “intimidation by union bosses” by taking away the element of ballot secrecy, said Dick Wadhams, chairman of the Colorado Republican Party.

Business owners are also opposed to the fact that the measure would triple damages for employers who fire union supporters or break other labor laws. The legislation would also mandate that a government arbitrator intervene if employers and workers cannot reach a contract within 120 days.


Udall’s, Bennet’s support sought

Local small business owners are encouraging U.S. Sens. Michael Bennet and Mark Udall — both Democrats — to back the legislation in its current form.

While Udall has not taken an “official” position on the current piece of legislation, he has supported similar legislation in the past. And during a debate last year with then-opponent Bob Schaffer, Udall said publicly that he supports the Employee Free Choice Act.

“The Bush Administration has been missing in action when it comes to the National Labor Relations Board’s responsibilities,” said Udall at the time. “The purpose of the Employee Free Choice Act has been to level the playing field to ensure that people in the workplace have access to those benefits and those salary rights and those working conditions that keep them productive, keep them efficient and keep the balance that we all know is so important between management and labor.” 

Bennet has been more ambiguous on the topic. His office pointed out yesterday that the bill’s lead negotiator, Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, has himself said that here are not enough votes for the current bill to move forward. 

Bennet, as well as several other Democrats, are anxiously waiting to see if Harkin is able to strike a deal between business and labor.

“I support efforts to reach a compromise,” said Bennet. “The question before us as we move forward is how to preserve the legitimate rights of workers to organize free from intimidation and the legitimate interest of small business to respond nimbly during our economic recovery.”

Meanwhile, Colorado members of Small Businesses for an Equitable Economy are calling on Bennet and Udall to back the current piece of legislation. They say unionized workers make one-third more in wages and are 52 percent more likely to have health care.

Terri Monley, owner of Gate City Moving in Denver, said the current state of the economy is reason enough to support the legislation.

“It’s time our economy worked for everyone again,” she said. “We have a fundamental economic problem: The middle class is disappearing in America. Congress needs to pass the Employee Free Choice Act because it is one of the most important steps we can take to strengthen our middle class and turn our economy around.”

 

Comments:
Dawn @ 2009-07-07 10:42:57Look how well the car manufacturers are doing with their union employees. We should all be unionized. I would be shocked if any of the small businesses in support of this bill have actually READ them. Small businesses with three employees would be subject to a union; how well would that business survive if the employees wanted more pay? Critical thinking, people.
Flag this comment as Inappropriate / Spam
T Gagliardi @ 2009-07-07 15:06:13EFCA—A four-letter word for small business By Tony Gagliardi For millions of Americans who have achieved their dream of owning their own small business and being their own bosses, the rules are about to change. Regular readers of the Business Journal are well aware of the mis-named Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA), a piece of federal legislation that would abolish the underpinnings of American enterprise as we know it, but a recent event sponsored by its supporters on June 10 in Denver calls for reminding again what this poisonous measure would do. EFCA would eliminate a business owner’s right to request a secret ballot election in union-organizing drives. Union organizers would simply collect signatures on authorizations, subjecting employees to possible harassment or intimidation. Once they get 50 percent of the workers to sign, that business is unionized. There would be no other step in the process. But wait, as the pitchmen of bad TV commercials like to say, there’s more. Should either management or labor be unable to reach an agreement on a contract, EFCA requires the federal government to step in and write one for them and hold them to it. A group calling itself Employee Free Choice Colorado, claiming it represented some small business owners, staged a press conference recently, calling for the passage of EFCA. As one publication noted, the group consisted mainly of union members and their supporters. Still, who knows how many innocent people might have been blinded by the pixie dust thrown in their eyes. As the voice of American small business for 66 years, the National Federation of Independent Business, which has more than 7,000 members in Colorado (a bit more than the 225 the other group claims to represent), can tell you the vast majority of small business owners oppose EFCA. And with good reason: Why would any entrepreneur support being shackled in the operation of his or her life dream? Should newly elected Colorado Senator Mark Udall, or recently appointed Colorado Senator Michael Bennet be undecided on how to vote on EFCA, let me suggest they take to heart former Sen. George McGovern’s counsel. This liberal icon and pillar of the Democratic Party took to the editorial pages of the Wall Street Journal last August to warn, “I am sad to say it [EFCA] runs counter to the ideals that were once at the core of the labor movement. Instead of providing a voice for the unheard, EFCA risks silencing those who would speak … There are many documented cases where workers have been pressured, harassed, tricked and intimidated into signing cards that have led to mandatory payment of dues … To my friends supporting EFCA I say this: We cannot be a party that strips working Americans of the right to a secret-ballot election. We are the party that has always defended the rights of the working class. To fail to ensure the right to vote free of intimidation and coercion from all sides would be a betrayal of what we have always championed.” Former politicians are famous for uttering things that run counter to their party’s current mindset, so McGovern’s editorial could be dismissed as just a classic aberration. Not in this case, however, as nine months later, McGovern editorialized again against EFCA. “… the bill has an additional feature that isn’t often mentioned but that is just as troublesome—compulsory arbitration. … A federally appointed arbitrator cannot be expected to understand the nuances specific to each business dispute, the competitive market position of the business, or the plethora of other factors unique to each case. Yet fundamental decisions on wages and benefit costs, rules for promotion, or even rules for exiting an unprofitable line of business could fall to federal arbitrators under EFCA.” We agree. On the issue of EFCA, Colorado small businesses stand with Sen. George McGovern. ### Tony Gagliardi is Colorado state director for the National Federation of Independent Business [Sources cited: My Party Should Respect Secret Union Ballots, Wall Street Journal, August 8, 2008; The Free Choice Act is Anything But, Wall Street Journal, May 7, 2009]
Flag this comment as Inappropriate / Spam
rick @ 2009-07-08 00:42:33My only questions for Tony Gagliardi are; - Is this a Gag? - Or are you a Liar? - Or are you Princess Di? (get it? Gag liar di !) Now that my juvenile urges are satisfied.... - Where did the NFIB, (N Fib! you just can't make this up...or can you? Sorry... it wasn't quite all out...) - Where did NFIB get most of their budget since 2000? In each year since then? I bet it's the owners of Big Business, not small business, that contributes most to getting the anti-Employee Free Choice Act message out. Probably just the Big Businesses way of showing solidarity with the Mom and Pop Shop with a few workers, (not Unionable except as an Associate Member which has no immediate effect, but shows Solidarity with other workers in your same situation - and gets you all of the benefits of being a Union member... access to Heathcare Plans, (check the Unions websites), job seeking help, education about your Rights as an American Worker, recreation, fellowship and networking, discounted Fare for All food programs, (50% off the most expensive foods you HAVE to buy - Meat, Veggies, Fruit... No questions asked, no forms to fill out, just sign your name, pay $12-22 a box and go spread the word!) I think the Big Corporations use these small business folks to spread the word to fight against something that will never affect them - my Cousin Scott used to think that when he heard President Reagan or President Bush (es) talk about how we had to have laws to protect the Small Business Owner, and how 90% of all new jobs are created by Small Business, and how we had to get Government off of the backs of the Small Business folks, and we had to "FREE THEM UP" to do the best that they could... well, my poor cousin Scott thought they were talking about him and his family... he had a one man shop, (the thing about small business is that it takes an unemployed person off the rolls - that's why small business creates so many jobs... the one who gets off unemployment becomes the CEO, CFO, COO, ECO, FOC... thus creating 4 extra jobs!) The only effect the Employee Free choice Act could have is to allow the small business's customer to have more money in their pockets... Most of Scott's stories about his old customers begin with, "before he lost his job...", in the first sentence. But yet he used to be one of those who joined the chamber of commerce and all the "business organizations" and he'd contribute his pittance to fight the nasty Unions that wanted him out of business. They spread the message - couched towards fear and ignorance, using buzz words that sounded right... if you were scared or ignorent or didn't really care one way or the other... I HEREBY CHALLENGE IRA GLASS OR ANY OTHER INVESTIGATIVE REPORTER to find out: - Is there really a Tony G ? Check his back ground... no WAY it could be an assumed identity - not even by a Witness Protection person... right? - Follow the money. - Interview the members of NFIB, CO at random and see if they are self employed or a Small Business person. Are they really threatened by unionization, or if, in a perfect world, if all people had living wage jobs, maybe their lives would be better too. -It seems fair for the small percentage of Americans who make most of the the money of Big Business to pay for most of the cost of fighting against something that will cost them money and mean more money for those who actually do the work that creates that wealth, but is it fair for that tiny percent of people to try to bolster their numbers by claiming to speak for the self employed business person? - Do the groups (if any) that are fighting the EFCA, infiltrate these civic minded middle class wanna bees and "match" their contributions and urge the NFIB type members to contribute to stop the EFCA?
Flag this comment as Inappropriate / Spam
Brian @ 2009-07-08 16:39:58I understand George McGovern apparently is interested in upholding the right of American workers to secret ballot elections (which, incidentally, did not exist before the 1930s). Is George McGovern also interested in upholding the right of all American citizens to freedom of association (which is enshrined in the Bill of Rights of the United States Constitution)? I submit that Freedom of Association--that workers be free to form organizations of their own choosing--is a much more significant issue. Is submit further that the current political and economic system deprives millions of Americans of their fundamental right to form organizations of their own choosing.
Flag this comment as Inappropriate / Spam
acquistare via internet @ 2009-08-28 16:45:13duurimcs toswimfh nsmgocso
Flag this comment as Inappropriate / Spam

 

Add a new comment...
Spammers: links do not work and our site gets monitored for spam daily and your comments will be removed -- please do not spam our site!
Your Name:
Your Email:
Title:
Comments:
If you are viewing this page with a screen reader or non-graphical browser, you may manually request registration by emailing us at
Please copy the characters from this image into the box below. All characters are either numbers 1-9 (not zero) or letters (upper and lowercase). If you cannot read this image, you can click it to try a different image (most browsers). Otherwise, submit the page anyway and try again.
Image Text:
Liquor Store

Trinity

AVS