Thursday, September 2, 2010
Click for Denver, Colorado Forecast
Search

CSU

Paramount

Facebook

Downtown Denver Partnership

Nuggets

 

Medical marijuana applications spike

Officials say docs may be abusing power, but do officials just want to limit registry?

Peter Marcus, DDN Staff Writer

Tuesday, August 4, 2009

 


State health officials are concerned about a massive increase in applications to the medical marijuana registry and are evaluating ways to increase oversight.

The health department says it is receiving nearly 2,000 new applications each month — up 5,616 between July 2008 and June 30 — more than doubling the registry over the past three months. As of June, the health department had received 8,918 applications — 4,282 of those applications were received between April and June.

Officials are concerned that doctors are abusing their professional powers in authorizing the applications. They say the majority of the applications are coming from “young men” with chronic pain, suggesting that young recreational pot smokers are abusing the system with the help of corrupt doctors.

“We are evaluating strategies that might allow us to assure that physicians documenting a diagnosis of chronic or severe pain are doing so within the standards of medical care,” said Chief Medical Officer Dr. Ned Calonge.


Disingenuous?

But medical marijuana advocates are calling health officials “disingenuous,” pointing out that they have opposed the medical marijuana registry since 2000 when Colorado voters backed an initiative allowing for medical marijuana.

“I find this frustrating because this health department has a history of using disingenuous tactics in its attempt to undermine medical marijuana laws,” said Brian Vicente, an attorney and executive director of medical marijuana advocacy group Sensible Colorado.

The health department on two separate occasions attempted to limit medical marijuana caregivers to five patients. But Sensible Colorado filed a lawsuit in 2007, which was upheld by District Judge Larry Naves who ruled that the state had imposed the new rules illegally by not holding public hearings, and that the state had made a “capricious decision” to enact the rules.

A public hearing was held last month by the Board of Health to examine a similar change to medical marijuana rules. But the Board narrowly rejected the new rules by a vote of 5-4.


Unfinished business?

Medical marijuana advocates thought they were in the clear following the public hearing, but it appears health officials are not done looking for ways to limit the registry. 

This time, however, they have their eyes set on doctors authorizing the applications, as opposed to caregivers who supply the patients.

Mark Salley, spokesman for the health department, said it is too premature to discuss strategies being discussed to increase oversight. But he added that there is reason to be concerned.

“When we have a situation — such as the one that was testified to at the Board meeting, when a single doctor had signed up 200 patients in a single day for the marijuana registry — it makes us be concerned about potential abuse of the registry,” he said.


Faulty statistics cited

Health officials stated at the public hearing last month that the average age of medical marijuana patients is 24 years old. But when asked by board members for actual data because there was conflicting statistics, the evidence was unavailable.

Vicente says his organization has examined the data and has found the average age of medical marijuana patients to be 41 years old.

“It’s unbelievable, these people are full of this,” said Vicente. “We were trying to get that, we were shocked, we were like, ‘How could it possibly have dropped to 24?’ Statistically that was crazy, and ultimately it was untrue, it was a falsehood furthered by the health department.”

Health officials said their false testimony was the result of a “computer error.”

Statistics released by the health department indicate that from July 2008 through June, 1,792 registry cards were issued to men under age 30, of which 89 percent had the diagnosis of severe pain. They say the “young males” represent 22 percent of all applications received during that time. 

During the last six months of 2008 there was an average of 70 applications per month for men under age 30 with severe pain; in May there were 264 such applications; and in June there were 364.


Attempt to limit registry?

Vicente says he is concerned that health officials are still attempting to limit the registry, which would lead to patients struggling to find care. He points out that more than 900 doctors have written authorizations for medical marijuana.

“It’s Sensible Colorado’s belief that the vast majority of these recommendations are valid,” said Vicente. “Hopefully (health officials) won’t take any action that would lead to less people using the program and infringe on the doctor-patient relationship in any way.”

 

Comments:
Mike @ 2009-08-04 01:22:46I think that good doctors realize the wide range of symptoms that marijuana can help. Anybody who needs aspirin should be able to get marijuana. If I was a doctor, I would rather give my patients something that they can't OD on, you could kill yourself if you take too much aspirin. - The doctors should give a recommendation to anyone who asks for it. -it's even proven to relieve menstrual cramps. If Pfizer came out with some lab-created pill that does everything MJ does : relieve pain, relieve stress, increase appetite, anti nausea, kill tumor cells while protecting nerves, - all with virtually no side-effects or risks (yes, NO RISKS, you don't have to smoke it) -and no toxicity level. -That pill would be hailed as the greatest medicinal achievement of all time. But , unfortunately, you can't patent a plant.
Flag this comment as Inappropriate / Spam
Wayward Bill @ 2009-08-04 08:00:55There is no mention of the climate of fear that occurred during Bush's tenure. The DEA raids and naturally doctors were reluctant to dispense medical marijuana. The spike occurs when Barack Obama made the DEA back off. This is nothing but posturing and no marijuana politics. Get over it. Medical Marijuana is on the constitution of this state and the board of health has no right to attempt this continued witch hunt. With the spike in medical marijuana patients there is an increase in tax revenue and the collection of the $90 application fee. Now where in the heck do they get off complaining. This is an economic boom for the state and is creating jobs. If the politicians were really smart they would be looking at legalizing, regulating, and taxing commercial (hemp), medical, & recreational marijuana. After 72 years it's time to re-examine marijuana prohibition. FREE THE WEED!
Flag this comment as Inappropriate / Spam
Wayward Bill @ 2009-08-04 08:03:15There is no mention of the climate of fear that occurred during Bush's tenure. The DEA raids and naturally doctors were reluctant to dispense medical marijuana. The spike occurs when Barack Obama made the DEA back off. This is nothing but posturing and no marijuana politics. Get over it. Medical Marijuana is on the constitution of this state and the board of health has no right to attempt this continued witch hunt. With the spike in medical marijuana patients there is an increase in tax revenue and the collection of the $90 application fee. Now where in the heck do they get off complaining. This is an economic boom for the state and is creating jobs. If the politicians were really smart they would be looking at legalizing, regulating, and taxing commercial (hemp), medical, & recreational marijuana. After 72 years it's time to re-examine marijuana prohibition. FREE THE WEED!
Flag this comment as Inappropriate / Spam
dg @ 2009-08-04 10:17:35This issue brings to mind a position I often hear from conservatives, that "government is the problem, not the solution". It would seem to me this would be a clasic example of time for government to just get out of the way. Conservatives for smaller government, individual freedom and self-responsibility, what do you say?
Flag this comment as Inappropriate / Spam
Gro4me @ 2009-08-04 10:57:00Or it could be a direct result of the shortage of pain management drugs since the DEA shut down manufacture of oxycontin at two of the three factories that make it and didn't increase the quota allowed at the remaining plant. And Vicodan and Percocette are going next. If you have a choiice between methadone - which is 5 times more addictive than heroin and kills - or marijuana, which is less addictive than caffeine and has never killed anyone, which would you choose?
Flag this comment as Inappropriate / Spam
scottportraits @ 2009-08-04 11:50:57Yes. Get the government out of the way. Let them develop this with personal responsibility and freedom as the rudder of conscience. Not a heavy-handed governmental intrusion.
Flag this comment as Inappropriate / Spam
Gro4me @ 2009-08-04 12:03:31It is also important to remember that pain does not discriminate on the basis of age and that 9% of the general population, including almost 15% of children, suffers from severe or chronic pain. Is it moral to deny a pain reliever to a child that is non-lethal, just because some people have passionate feelings about a plant?
Flag this comment as Inappropriate / Spam
Swooper420 @ 2009-08-04 14:31:21Sounds like you folks in CO are going to have to stay on top of the issue, and continue to keep the health department honest. Congratulations on getting your law written into your state's Constitution. It will make making changes difficult for LEO & their minions in the state legislature.
Flag this comment as Inappropriate / Spam
izick @ 2009-08-04 14:41:04it's true that friendly doctors are helping recreational users steer clear of the law by generously passing out prescriptions. and it's true that the system is being abused. but i'm not sure if we should encourage or discourage this practice as a community. i'm excited about the proliferation of medical marijuana patients, and i'm eager to become part of the registry as soon as possible. but maybe as a community we're taking a mile after being given an inch, and we are taking advantage.
Flag this comment as Inappropriate / Spam
izick @ 2009-08-04 14:41:36it's true that friendly doctors are helping recreational users steer clear of the law by generously passing out prescriptions. and it's true that the system is being abused. but i'm not sure if we should encourage or discourage this practice as a community. i'm excited about the proliferation of medical marijuana patients, and i'm eager to become part of the registry as soon as possible. but maybe as a community we're taking a mile after being given an inch, and we are taking advantage.
Flag this comment as Inappropriate / Spam
Aaron @ 2009-08-04 15:03:22So I wonder what happens to patients that already have valid perscriptions from a doctor that the Health Department considers "corrupt"?
Flag this comment as Inappropriate / Spam
jon @ 2009-08-09 20:03:46
Flag this comment as Inappropriate / Spam

 

Add a new comment...
Spammers: links do not work and our site gets monitored for spam daily and your comments will be removed -- please do not spam our site!
Your Name:
Your Email:
Title:
Comments:
If you are viewing this page with a screen reader or non-graphical browser, you may manually request registration by contacting us
Please copy the characters from this image into the box below. All characters are either numbers 1-9 (not zero) or letters (upper and lowercase). If you cannot read this image, you can click it to try a different image (most browsers). Otherwise, submit the page anyway and try again.
Image Text:
Liquor Store

AVS

Trinity

Twitter-Daily Deal

AFW